Case Alleged Deception on Website Allowing People to Vote
Whether Individuals Are Jerks
The Director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Jessica Rich, issued the following statement regarding
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruling
upholding a Federal Trade Commission summary decision against John Fanning,
the creator of Jerk.com:
“This ruling makes it clear that the defendant’s
misrepresentations in this case were harmful to consumers.” Rich said. “We
are pleased with the ruling, and will closely monitor the defendant’s
compliance with the order, as we do in all our cases.”
In its ruling, the Court affirmed the
Commission’s finding that Jerk.com and Fanning deceived consumers about
the source of the information contained on the site and the benefits of
paying for membership in the site.
It also upheld the bulk of the Commission’s remedial order,
including prohibiting Fanning from making further deceptive statements,
requiring him to maintain records of advertising and marketing materials
and notify the FTC of any complaints related to misleading or deceptive
statements, and requiring him to provide a copy of the order to employees
and officers of companies Fanning operates whose work is relevant to the
order.
The Court vacated a requirement that Fanning give the FTC
updates on his employment status for jobs unrelated to his unlawful activity
and remanded to the Commission for further deliberations on this part of
the order.
The FTC
first filed suit against Fanning and Jerk.com in 2014.
The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and
protect
and educate consumers. You can learn more
about consumer topics and file a consumer
complaint online or by calling 1-877-FTC-HELP (382-4357). Like
the FTC on Facebook,
follow us on Twitter,
read our blogs
and subscribe
to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.
Contact Information
MEDIA CONTACT:
Jay Mayfield
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2181
STAFF CONTACT:
Sarah Schroeder
FTC Western Region
415-848-5186
Related Case
More news from the FTC >>
|
No comments:
Post a Comment